Cleo Gene Roderick v. State of Oregon, H. C. Cupp, Warden

Ninth Circuit

Cleo Gene Roderick v. State of Oregon, H. C. Cupp, Warden

454 F.2d 214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 1972

Docket71-1596

StatusPublished

This text of 454 F.2d 214 (Cleo Gene Roderick v. State of Oregon, H. C. Cupp, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleo Gene Roderick v. State of Oregon, H. C. Cupp, Warden, 454 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The dismissal of Roderick’s habeas corpus petition after a hearing is affirmed.

The arresting officers had reliable information that a felony warrant was outstanding in Idaho.

The search of the automobile which produced incriminating evidence was justified for the officers’ own safety. And, when they found the gun, it was not required to be ignored legally.

Roderick’s lineup is challenged. Although counsel was not present, Wade v. United States, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149, is not retroactive. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199. Assuming counsel had been present, it is not clear that there was anything bad about the lineup.

We find the points about unreasonable delay and cruel and unusual punishment to be without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI