Clemshire v. Boone County Bank

14 S.W. 901, 53 Ark. 512, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 138
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Battle, J.

The first five declarations of law asked for by appellant were based on evidence adduced on the trial. If the facts therein hypothetically stated were true, the note sued on was without legal consideration and void. The law should have been declared as therein asked. Rowe v. Blanchard, 18 Wis., 462; Rice v. Garnhart, 34 Wis., 453, 461; Bliss v. Negus, 8 Mass., 46; Dickinson v. Hall, 14 Pick., 217; Harlow v. Putnam, 124 Mass., 553; Electric Co. v. Howard, 148 Mass., 359; Brown v. Tarkington, 3 Wall., 377; Cross v. Huntly, 13 Wend., 385; Darst v. Brockway, 11 Ohio, 462; Nye v. Raymond, 16 111., 153.

Reversed and remanded.

COCKRILL, C. J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clemshire v. Boone County Bank, 14 S.W. 901, 53 Ark. 512, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 138 (Ark. 1890).

14 S.W. 901 (Clemshire v. Boone County Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Wilson
181 F. Supp. 351 (E.D. Arkansas, 1960)
Mackin v. Shannon
165 F. 98 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas, 1908)
Brown v. Ohio National Bank
18 App. D.C. 598 (D.C. Circuit, 1901)