Clemshire v. Boone County Bank
This text of 14 S.W. 901 (Clemshire v. Boone County Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first five declarations of law asked for by appellant were based on evidence adduced on the trial. If the facts therein hypothetically stated were true, the note sued on was without legal consideration and void. The law should have been declared as therein asked. Rowe v. Blanchard, 18 Wis., 462; Rice v. Garnhart, 34 Wis., 453, 461; Bliss v. Negus, 8 Mass., 46; Dickinson v. Hall, 14 Pick., 217; Harlow v. Putnam, 124 Mass., 553; Electric Co. v. Howard, 148 Mass., 359; Brown v. Tarkington, 3 Wall., 377; Cross v. Huntly, 13 Wend., 385; Darst v. Brockway, 11 Ohio, 462; Nye v. Raymond, 16 111., 153.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.W. 901, 53 Ark. 512, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemshire-v-boone-county-bank-ark-1890.