Clemons v. P & J Contracting Co.
Opinion
This case is controlled by Huckstorf v. Vince L. Schneider Enterprises (1968), 41 Wis. 2d 45, 163 N. W. 2d 190. When a piece of construction equipment is leased to another and the lessor agrees to supply an operator, and the operator is to take directions from [771]*771the lessee or his employees, the only question is whether the operator actually or impliedly consented to work for a special employer. Silence when the work continues over a substantial period of time constitutes consent. The crane operator in this case was engaged in work for the general contractor rather than his usual employer, P & J Contracting Company, Inc., over a period of forty-seven days. He was silent during that entire time. As a matter of law, he was an employee of the general contractor, loaned by P & J Contracting Company, Inc.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
205 N.W.2d 164 (Clemons v. P & J Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.