Clemmons v. Washington County

869 So. 2d 1275, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 2004 WL 832910
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-0882
StatusPublished

This text of 869 So. 2d 1275 (Clemmons v. Washington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clemmons v. Washington County, 869 So. 2d 1275, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 2004 WL 832910 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants have filed this appeal seeking review of an order entitled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.” This order determined that the court is required to sustain the decisions of the defendants, who are governmental entities. However, because this order does not enter judgment, this appeal is premature and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “To be appealable as a final order, an order must contain unequivocal language of finality.” See, e.g., Hoffman v. Hall, 817 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benton v. Moore
655 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hoffman v. Hall
817 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 So. 2d 1275, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 2004 WL 832910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemmons-v-washington-county-fladistctapp-2004.