Clemmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clemmons v. State

510 S.W.3d 364, 2017 WL 490446, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 116

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 2017·No. No. ED 104006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eric D. Clemmons appeals from the “Order” denying his motion alleging abandonment by post-conviction counsel in 1988 when post-conviction counsel filed an unverified amended motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eric D. Clemmons appeals from the “Order” denying his motion alleging abandonment by post-conviction counsel in 1988 when post-conviction counsel filed an unverified amended motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clemmons v. State, 510 S.W.3d 364, 2017 WL 490446, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 116 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 364 (Clemmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.