Clemmer v. State Ex Rel. Roberts

Supreme Court of Florida

Clemmer v. State Ex Rel. Roberts

188 So. 927, 140 Fla. 552

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 2, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

This cause coming on to be heard upon writ of error addressed to a judgment awarding a peremp *553 tory writ of mandamus, and having been duly considered by the Court upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, the conclusion of the Court is that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and .Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Terrell and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam. —

This cause coming on to be heard upon writ of error addressed to a judgment awarding a peremp *553 tory writ of mandamus, and having been duly considered by the Court upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, the conclusion of the Court is that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and .Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Terrell and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Clemmer v. State Ex Rel. Roberts, 188 So. 927, 140 Fla. 552 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

188 So. 927 (Clemmer v. State Ex Rel. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.