Clemilt Realty Co. v. Wood

194 A.D. 508, 186 N.Y.S. 415, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6675
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Laughlin, J.:

This lease was made after the enactment of chapter 136 of the Laws of 1920 and before the enactment of chapter 944, and the defense made is a defense authorized by said chapter 136. There is no material difference between the facts of this case and those presented in Levy Leasing Co., Inc., v. Siegel (194 App. Div. 482), argued and decided herewith, and the contentions with respect to the invalidity of the statute are substantially the same. The order should, therefore, be affirmed on the authority of our decision in the other case, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Mebbell and Gbeenbaum, JJ., concur; Clabke, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clemilt Realty Co. v. Wood, 194 A.D. 508, 186 N.Y.S. 415, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

194 A.D. 508 (Clemilt Realty Co. v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel
194 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)