Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.

545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1989
DocketNo. 88-981
StatusPublished

This text of 545 So. 2d 308 (Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A., 545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. [309]*309661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc.
538 So. 2d 1322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Banfield Et Ux. v. Addington Et Ux.
140 So. 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-sun-bankmiami-na-fladistctapp-1989.