Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.
This text of 545 So. 2d 308 (Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. [309]*309661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-sun-bankmiami-na-fladistctapp-1989.