Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.
545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175
Opinion
The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. [309]*309661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A., 545 So. 2d 308, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 976, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 1989 WL 36175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
545 So. 2d 308 (Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc.
538 So. 2d 1322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Banfield Et Ux. v. Addington Et Ux.
140 So. 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)