Clements v. State
147 S.E. 792, 39 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 416
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of violating the “labor-contract act” .(Penal Code of 1910, § 915). “The evidence failing to disclose an intent to defraud on the part of the defendant at the time the advances were obtained, the conviction was unauthorized,” and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Raffield v. State, 7 Ga. App. 422 (2) (67 8. E. 109) ; Curry v. State, 7 Ga. App. 582 (67 S. E. 698).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clements v. State, 147 S.E. 792, 39 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 416 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
147 S.E. 792 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holt v. State
362 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Bullard v. State
2 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Cofer v. State
147 S.E. 792 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)