Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Clements v. State

Clements v. State

147 S.E. 792, 39 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 416
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 9, 1929
Docket19509
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 147 S.E. 792 (Clements v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clements v. State, 147 S.E. 792, 39 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 416 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the “labor-contract act” .(Penal Code of 1910, § 915). “The evidence failing to disclose an intent to defraud on the part of the defendant at the time the advances were obtained, the conviction was unauthorized,” and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Raffield v. State, 7 Ga. App. 422 (2) (67 8. E. 109) ; Curry v. State, 7 Ga. App. 582 (67 S. E. 698).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Ben Smith, for plaintiff in error. H. G. Morgan, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holt v. State
362 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Bullard v. State
2 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Cofer v. State
147 S.E. 792 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 792, 39 Ga. App. 554, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-state-gactapp-1929.