Clements v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clements v. State

112 S.E. 292, 28 Ga. App. 557, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 687

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clements v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Ga. App. 524 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 9, 1922·No. 13392·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in admitting in evidence all of the dying declarations of the person alleged to have been shot by the accused.

2. Eor no reason assigned was it error for the court to instruct the jury as complained of in ground 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

[558]*558Decided May 9, 1922.

Indictment for murder — conviction of shooting at’ another; from Toombs superior court- — -Judge Hardeman. January 17, 1933.

Williams & Corbitt, for plaintiff in error. Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, E. J. Giles, Lankford & Rogers, contra.

3. The motion for a new trial points out no error of law as having been committed on the trial; the evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment of the court below must be Affirmed.

Broyles, C. ■/., and buhe, •/., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in admitting in evidence all of the dying declarations of the person alleged to have been shot by the accused.

2. Eor no reason assigned was it error for the court to instruct the jury as complained of in ground 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

[558]*558Decided May 9, 1922.

Indictment for murder — conviction of shooting at’ another; from Toombs superior court- — -Judge Hardeman. January 17, 1933.

Williams & Corbitt, for plaintiff in error. Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, E. J. Giles, Lankford & Rogers, contra.

3. The motion for a new trial points out no error of law as having been committed on the trial; the evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment of the court below must be Affirmed.

Broyles, C. ■/., and buhe, •/., concur.

Clements v. State, 112 S.E. 292, 28 Ga. App. 557, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 687 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 292 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.