Clements v. State
97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 625, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
Opinion
The answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari was neither traversed nor excepted to. The evidence, as set forth in the answer, with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clements v. State, 97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 625, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
97 S.E. 81 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boswell v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
192 S.E. 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)