Clements v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clements v. State

97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 625, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 8, 1918

Docket9843

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 81 (Clements v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clements v. State, 97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 625, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

The answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari was neither traversed nor excepted to. The evidence, as set forth in the answer, with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

The answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari was neither traversed nor excepted to. The evidence, as set forth in the answer, with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 625, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-state-gactapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack