Clements v. State

51 S.E. 595, 123 Ga. 547, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 1, 1905·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. The evidence in this case proved the defendant guilty of murder, and there was nothing to require a charge on the subject of manslaughter.

2. The mere allegation, in a ground of a motion for a new trial, that while the defendant in a criminal case was making his statement a woman in the gallery or back part of the court-room burst out crying and sobbing loudly, but was immediately removed by the sheriff under the order of the court, who thereupon refused to declare a mistrial, furnishes no ground for reversal, it not appearing who the woman was or how the defendant was injured by the occurrence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, G. J., absent. Brown & Brown and E. M. Smith, for plaintiff in error. John G. Hart, attorney-general, and O. H. B. Bloodworth, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clements v. State, 51 S.E. 595, 123 Ga. 547, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 537 (Ga. 1905).

51 S.E. 595 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sparks v. State
501 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Avery v. State
70 S.E.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Glenn v. State
52 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Davis v. State
131 So. 900 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Hanye v. State
101 So. 108 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)