Clements v. State

340 So. 2d 1183, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15836
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1976·No. No. 75-1042·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record herein we are of the opinion that appellant’s motion to vacate pursuant to Rule 3.850 contains legally sufficient allegations which, if true, would entitle petitioner to relief. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971). Furthermore, inasmuch as the record does not conclusively demonstrate that such allegations are not true an evidentiary hearing is required. McClendon v. Wainwright, 280 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

REVERSED AND REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

MAGER, Ci J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clements v. State, 340 So. 2d 1183, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15836 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

340 So. 2d 1183 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gunn v. State
378 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)