Clements v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Clements v. State

1 So. 2d 466, 146 Fla. 443, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1165

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 28, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole question presented having been, the one whether the testimony was sufficient to justify a verdict of guilty of manslaughter and upon careful consideration of the record no error having clearly appeared, the judgment of the lower court is—

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Terrell and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The sole question presented having been, the one whether the testimony was sufficient to justify a verdict of guilty of manslaughter and upon careful consideration of the record no error having clearly appeared, the judgment of the lower court is—

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Terrell and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Clements v. State, 1 So. 2d 466, 146 Fla. 443, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1165 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

1 So. 2d 466 (Clements v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.