Clements v. Henderson

70 So. 439, 70 Fla. 260
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 70 So. 439 (Clements v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clements v. Henderson, 70 So. 439, 70 Fla. 260 (Fla. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A bill was filed to have certain realty set aside as the homestead of the claimant, to enjoin a sale thereof under a common law judgment, and to quiet the title of the complainant as against the lien of the judgment. A demurrer to the bill was sustained, and this appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrer.

. The demurrer points out no specific objection to the manner of pleading the facts relied on, but apparently rests upon the theory that the realty being a homestead the judgment constitutes no lien thereon.

We have no brief in support of the demurrer, and a reading of the bill discloses no lack of allegation going to make up a homestead under our constitution. The facts alleged, however, are facts in pais, dependent for their proof upon ephemeral testimony and the complain[261]*261ant had a right to have those facts established by a binding decree as against this defendant. Moreover the bill shows without this aid the realty is unsalable.

That our courts of equity are open for the purpose of granting this relief, we think is firmly established. Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533, 58 South. Rep. 718; Smith v. Gufford, 36 Fla. 481, 18 South. Rep. 717, 51 Am. St. Rep. 37; McMichael v. Grady, 34 Fla. 219, 15 South. Rep. 765.

Order reversed, with directions to overrule the demurrer. ,

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prieto v. Eastern Nat. Bank
719 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
City of Miami v. St. Joe Paper Co.
364 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Wadsworth
346 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.
224 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Smith v. St. Petersburg Novelty Works
113 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 So. 439, 70 Fla. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-henderson-fla-1915.