Clements v. Haskins

134 S.E. 125, 35 Ga. App. 484, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 930
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1926
Docket17297
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 125 (Clements v. Haskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clements v. Haskins, 134 S.E. 125, 35 Ga. App. 484, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 930 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Beoyees, C. J.

Where an affidavit of illegality is based upon the ground that the affiant was not served in the suit, and where the affidavit sets forth a return of service by the sheriff and a traverse of such return by the affiant, and it is not alleged in the traverse that the traverse was made at the next term of the court after.the affiant had notice of the sheriff’s return, the affidavit of illegality is subject to dismissal on demurrer. Knight v. Jones, 63 Ga. 481; Civil Code (1910), § 5566.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. Jones
63 Ga. 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 125, 35 Ga. App. 484, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-haskins-gactapp-1926.