Clements v. Boca Aviation, Inc.
This text of 444 So. 2d 597 (Clements v. Boca Aviation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We believe the trial court erred in excluding interrogatories and answers thereto as to the policy of Boca Aviation, Inc. to require certain minimum flying experience on the part of persons renting its aircraft. Reese v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, 360 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), cert. dismissed, 366 So.2d 884 (Fla.1978). Because there is evidence that this policy was violated and that the violation may have had some causal connection to the accident in question, we cannot conclude that the error was harmless. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 597, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clements-v-boca-aviation-inc-fladistctapp-1984.