Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves
This text of Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves (Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
03-837 C/W 03-169
CLEMENTINE FAIRROW, ET AL.
VERSUS
JAMES E. MARVES, ET AL.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NUMBER 196,834 HONORABLE GEORGE C. METOYER, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE
JIMMIE C. PETERS JUDGE
Court composed of Billie Colombaro Woodard, Jimmie C. Peters, and Michael G. Sullivan, Judges.
AFFIRMED. Woodard, J., dissents and assigns written reasons.
Bradley Drell Michael E. Trachtenberg Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell Post Office Box 6118 Alexandria, LA 71307 (318) 445-4516 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES: Clementine Fairrow Eloise Ann Fairrow Parks
Edward A. Kaplan Post Office Box 12386 Alexandria, LA 71315 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS: James E. Marves Succession of James Marves PETERS, J.
For the reasons set forth in Fairrow v. Marves, 03-169 (La.App. 3 Cir. _/_/_),
we affirm the judgments below at the appellants’ cost.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clementine-fairrow-v-james-e-marves-lactapp-2003.