Clement v. State
468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1573
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 468 So. 2d 467 (Clement v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clement v. State, 468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
While we affirm all of the judgment and convictions, we must remand for resentenc-ing. The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).
Upon resentencing, there can be no retention of jurisdiction, and any departure from the guidelines must be based upon clear and convincing reasons, expressed in writing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clement v. State
508 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Dawson v. State
491 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.