Clement v. State
468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876
Opinion
While we affirm all of the judgment and convictions, we must remand for resentenc-ing. The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).
Upon resentencing, there can be no retention of jurisdiction, and any departure from the guidelines must be based upon clear and convincing reasons, expressed in writing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clement v. State, 468 So. 2d 467, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
468 So. 2d 467 (Clement v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clement v. State
508 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Dawson v. State
491 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)