Clement v. Merker
This text of 70 N.E.2d 167 (Clement v. Merker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied upon the ground that the record submitted by both parties reveals a controversy involving issues of fact which should be tried (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113; Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 271, 272.) No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thaoher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 N.E.2d 167, 296 N.Y. 671, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-merker-ny-1946.