Clement v. LaHood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1531

AUDREY CLEMENT; JOHN REEDER,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

and

JOSHUA RUEBNER,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAY H. LAHOOD, U. S. Department of Transportation; VICTOR MENDEZ, Administrator Federal Highway Administration; ROBERTO FONSECO-MARTINEZ, Virginia Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration; DAVID S. EKERN, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: August 17, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Audrey Clement, John Reeder, Appellants Pro Se. Allen M. Brabender, Bernard G. Kim, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Dwight Eib, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Audrey Clement and John Reeder appeal the district

court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

Government and dismissing Clement’s civil complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Clement and Reeder’s motion for a stay pending appeal

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Clement v. LaHood, No. 1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 30,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED