Clement v. Ferenback

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 57
CourtNew York Marine Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 57 (Clement v. Ferenback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clement v. Ferenback, 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 57 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).

Opinion

McAdajx, J.-

The defendant Ferenback moves to set aside the judgment entered herein by default August 28, 1877, for irregularity, in this : that the affidavit of service is without a venue—i. e., the words “ city and county of New York, ss.f are omitted from the caption. Affidavits should, by the settled practice, contain a venue, and it is said to be an essential part of an affidavit, because it is prima facie evidence of the place where it was taken, and upon its face shows the important fact whether the officer before whom the affidavit was taken performed his official act within the locality for which he was appointed or author[58]*58ized to act (see Thompson v. Burhans, 61 N. Y. 63; Lane v. Morse, 6 How. 394; Cook v. Statts, 18 Barb. 407; Vincent v. The People, 5 Park. Cr. 88 ; Belden v. Devoe, 13 Wend. 225, note; 1 Barb. Ch. [1st Edn.] 601). The irregularity is amendable, however (Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 721, 722, 723, 724; Fawcett v. Vary, 59 N. Y. 597 ; Hogan v. Hoyt, 37 Id. 300 ; Jones v. United States Slate Co., 16 How. Pr. 129), in furtherance of justice.

The defendant’s motion to set aside the judgment will therefore be granted, unless, within five days, the plaintiff files a new affidavit of service in strict conformity to the rules of practice, and containing a proper venue, which he will be allowed to do nunc pro tune. The execution issued upon the judgment conforms substantially to the statutory requirements (Walker v. Hubbard, 4 How. Pr. 154), and will not be disturbed, if the above amendment be made.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fawcett v. . Vary
59 N.Y. 597 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Walker v. Hubbard
4 How. Pr. 154 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Jones v. United States Slates Co.
16 How. Pr. 129 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Vincent v. People
5 Park. Cr. 88 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-ferenback-nymarct-1877.