Clement v. . Clement
4 S.E.2d 434, 216 N.C. 240, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 135
This text of 4 S.E.2d 434 (Clement v. . Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clement v. . Clement, 4 S.E.2d 434, 216 N.C. 240, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 135 (N.C. 1939).
Opinion
The general appearance of the defendant renders the writ of attachment immaterial as a basis for the service of summons by publication. The court found, on competent evidence, that both the plaintiff and defendant are nonresidents of North Carolina. Thus, the plaintiff was entitled to maintain her action in any county in this State she might designate. C. S., 469.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brittain v. Blankenship
94 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 S.E.2d 434, 216 N.C. 240, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-clement-nc-1939.