Clement v. . Clement

4 S.E.2d 434, 216 N.C. 240, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 135
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 27, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The general appearance of the defendant renders the writ of attachment immaterial as a basis for the service of summons by publication. The court found, on competent evidence, that both the plaintiff and defendant are nonresidents of North Carolina. Thus, the plaintiff was entitled to maintain her action in any county in this State she might designate. C. S., 469.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clement v. . Clement, 4 S.E.2d 434, 216 N.C. 240, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 135 (N.C. 1939).

4 S.E.2d 434 (Clement v. . Clement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brittain v. Blankenship
94 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)