Clement v. Burtis
121 N.Y. 708
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clement v. Burtis, 121 N.Y. 708 (N.Y. 1890).
121 N.Y. 708 (Clement v. Burtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Queen City Park Assoc. v. Gale
3 A.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1938)
Cowen v. Epstein
248 Ill. App. 111 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Isaacs v. Schmuck
156 N.E. 621 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Fraley, Adm'r v. Wilkinson
1920 OK 244 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Bull v. . Burton
124 N.E. 111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Ingersoll Engineering & Constructing Co. v. Crocker
228 F. 844 (Sixth Circuit, 1915)
Goodrich v. Pratt
114 A.D. 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Dieterlen v. Miller
114 A.D. 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Bragdon v. Blaisdell
39 A. 1036 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)
Reynolds v. Cleary
16 N.Y.S. 421 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)