Clement v. Bunn
This text of 60 Ga. 334 (Clement v. Bunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sheriff was ruled for a large sum of money on his failure to make it on a mortgage execution upon real estate.
The superior court made the rule absolute, and the sheriff excepted on two grounds: first, because the rule was made absolute for the amount due on the fi.fa., and not for the value of the land; secondly, because on the rule absolute, the court ordered execution to issue against him with 20 per cent, interest, and at the same time directed that he be attached for contempt.
Indeed, it appears from the record that steps were taken at chambers by the judge to correct the inadvertent order, and whilst the legality of such modified order at chambers may be questioned, yet it shows that no harm was done the sheriff by the part of the order of court which directed him to be attached, yet its effect was to relieve him from the attachment, and no harm has been done him by it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Ga. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-bunn-ga-1878.