Clement v. Bacon
143 A.D. 960
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Krtfse and Robson, JJ., who dissented upon the authority of Matter of Huff (136 App. Div. 297).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clement v. Bacon, 143 A.D. 960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 960 (Clement v. Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Huff
136 A.D. 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)