Clement v. Bacon
143 A.D. 960
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1911
StatusPublished
This text of 143 A.D. 960 (Clement v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clement v. Bacon, 143 A.D. 960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Krtfse and Robson, JJ., who dissented upon the authority of Matter of Huff (136 App. Div. 297).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Huff
136 A.D. 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 A.D. 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clement-v-bacon-nyappdiv-1911.