Clemens v. Testard
6 Teiss. 177
Opinions
The motion herein fails to comply with the rules of this Court in that it was not “accompanied by three copies of a written or printed brief which has been served upon the opposing counsel. Under the circumstances we shall not pass on the motion jin limine, but shall consider it when the tease is heard on the merits.
The motion is therefore denied without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clemens v. Testard, 6 Teiss. 177 (La. Ct. App. 1909).
6 Teiss. 177 (Clemens v. Testard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stuart v. Ansley
44 So. 294 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Audubon Hotel Co. v. Braunig
44 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Brode v. Firemen's Insurance
8 Rob. 38 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1844)