Clemens v. Testard
6 Teiss. 177
This text of 6 Teiss. 177 (Clemens v. Testard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clemens v. Testard, 6 Teiss. 177 (La. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinions
The motion herein fails to comply with the rules of this Court in that it was not “accompanied by three copies of a written or printed brief which has been served upon the opposing counsel. Under the circumstances we shall not pass on the motion jin limine, but shall consider it when the tease is heard on the merits.
The motion is therefore denied without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stuart v. Ansley
44 So. 294 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Audubon Hotel Co. v. Braunig
44 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)
Brode v. Firemen's Insurance
8 Rob. 38 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1844)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Teiss. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemens-v-testard-lactapp-1909.