Clemens v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Clemens v. Mayo

31 So. 2d 869, 159 Fla. 473, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 809

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 16, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 So. 2d 869 (Clemens v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clemens v. Mayo, 31 So. 2d 869, 159 Fla. 473, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 809 (Fla. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued and return thereto made by Nathan Mayo as Prison Custodian showing that petitioner is held by respondent under and by virtue of good and valid judgments and commitments other than that of which he complains, the return is considered sufficient and the said writ is quashed and petitioner is remanded on authority of our opinion and judgment in re Ex Parte George F. Puckett, filed September 12th, 1947.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued and return thereto made by Nathan Mayo as Prison Custodian showing that petitioner is held by respondent under and by virtue of good and valid judgments and commitments other than that of which he complains, the return is considered sufficient and the said writ is quashed and petitioner is remanded on authority of our opinion and judgment in re Ex Parte George F. Puckett, filed September 12th, 1947.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 So. 2d 869, 159 Fla. 473, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemens-v-mayo-fla-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack