Clemens v. Gilbert

12 Pa. 255
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The justice’s docket contains no entry of an offer to confess judgment for a particular sum. The fact that such an offer was made appears in his certificate to authenticate the transcript sent up with the appeal; but it is no part of the transcript; and no better than the unofficial assertion of the justice, which would not be received even under the sanction of his oath.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clemens v. Gilbert, 12 Pa. 255 (Pa. 1849).

12 Pa. 255 (Clemens v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malatesta v. Alberti Sales & Service
46 Pa. D. & C. 709 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1942)