Clemens v. Apple

104 A.D.2d 672, 479 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clemens v. Apple. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 A.D.2d 236

Opinion

— Motion for reargument denied, without costs.

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Was so much of Special Term’s order, as affirmed by this court, as granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, correct as a matter of law?” Main, J. P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clemens v. Apple, 104 A.D.2d 672, 479 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 672 (Clemens v. Apple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.