Clem v. Hancock

Indiana Supreme Court

Clem v. Hancock

170 N.E.2d 904, 241 Ind. 703, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 190

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1961

DocketNo. 0-611

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 N.E.2d 904 (Clem v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clem v. Hancock, 170 N.E.2d 904, 241 Ind. 703, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 190 (Ind. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Petitioner has filed pro se in forma pauperis, a paper which purports to be an appeal from a judgment in contempt entered against petitioner in the Vanderburgh Probate Court.

The paper does not in anywise conform with the requirements of Rule 2-35 for the filing of a transcript of record, nor does it describe the nature of the action which resulted in judgment for contempt.

Furthermore, it is shown to the court that the proceedings to which this purported original action is related has been dismissed and therefore any issue relative thereto is now moot.

Therefore the paper hereinabove referred to is ordered stricken from the files of this court.

Note. — Reported in 170 N. E. 2d 904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI