Clelland v. Clelland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Clelland v. Clelland

131 P. 153, 89 Kan. 444

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 12, 1913

DocketNo. 18,055

StatusPublished

This text of 131 P. 153 (Clelland v. Clelland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clelland v. Clelland, 131 P. 153, 89 Kan. 444 (kan 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is subject to dismissal because the appellant has failed to comply with an order of this court to pay the appellee a sum of money to enable her to present her side of the controversy. Some affidavits are filed for the appellant, attempting to excuse his default, but he withholds any statement of his own respecting his ability to comply with the order. However, the court has investigated the merits of the appeal and finds that none of the assignments of error is well taken. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is subject to dismissal because the appellant has failed to comply with an order of this court to pay the appellee a sum of money to enable her to present her side of the controversy. Some affidavits are filed for the appellant, attempting to excuse his default, but he withholds any statement of his own respecting his ability to comply with the order. However, the court has investigated the merits of the appeal and finds that none of the assignments of error is well taken. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 P. 153, 89 Kan. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clelland-v-clelland-kan-1913.