Clein v. City of Atlanta
This text of 124 S.E. 882 (Clein v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ordinance set out in the statement of facts is not void for the reasons assigned, that it is an unlawful exercise of the police power and “an undue and unwarranted and unjustifiable regulation of and interference with the business of petitioners.” Nor is the classification [122]*122unfair and unreasonable as alleged. Shurman v. Atlanta, 148 &a. 4 (7), 13 (95 S. E. 698). The judge did not err in refusing the temporary injunction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.E. 882, 159 Ga. 121, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clein-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1924.