Cleghorn v. Maples

1994 OK 7, 867 P.2d 1272, 65 O.B.A.J. 300, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 10, 1994 WL 19558
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 18, 1994·No. No. 82681·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

HODGES, Chief Justice.

The petition for writ of certiorari to review a certified interlocutory order is hereby re[1273]*1273cast as an application to assume original jurisdiction for the issuance of a petition for writ of prohibition. Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of prohibition is issued. The trial judge is prohibited from enforcing his order of November 4, 1993, bifurcating the trial of petitioner’s cause. Petitioner is entitled to proceed directly against his uninsured motorist insurance carrier and need not first obtain a recovery against the alleged tortfeasor. Keel v. M.F.A Insurance Company, 553 P.2d 153 (Okl.1976), Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Company, 662 P.2d 681 (Okl.1983), Buzzard v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., 824 P.2d 1105 (Okl.1991), and Buzzard v. McDanel, 736 P.2d 157 (Okl.1987).

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and HARGRAVE, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleghorn v. Maples, 1994 OK 7, 867 P.2d 1272, 65 O.B.A.J. 300, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 10, 1994 WL 19558 (Okla. 1994).

1994 OK 7 (Cleghorn v. Maples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PUMMILL v. HANCOCK EXPLORATION LLC
419 P.3d 1268 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2018)
Christian v. Gray
2003 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2003)
McCormack v. Town of Granite
1996 OK 19 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1996)