Cleghorn v. Goldsmith

532 P.2d 609, 91 Nev. 160, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 573
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1975
DocketNo. 7636
StatusPublished

This text of 532 P.2d 609 (Cleghorn v. Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleghorn v. Goldsmith, 532 P.2d 609, 91 Nev. 160, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 573 (Neb. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

William Cleghorn was a ten-year employee of Wackenhut Services, Inc., a subcontractor for the Atomic Energy Commission. While working at his duties as Security Inspector he [161]*161was fired for striking a fellow employee with his pistol during an altercation. A hearing before a grievance arbitrator provided by the existing union contract resulted in his reinstatement. However, he was denied permission to carry a firearm until and unless he took and passed a psychiatric examination. Eventually he was fully reinstated after the evaluation but he brought this lawsuit alleging that the respondents through their agents and employees conspired to terminate his employment, impair his professional reputation and generally defame him.

The trial court granted an NRCP 12(b) motion to dismiss on the ground that Wackenhut Services, Inc., as an agency or contractor of the federal government functioning in security areas was immune from prosecution. Cleghorn appeals.

The employer company’s representatives had good and sufficient reason to be apprehensive of Cleghom’s emotional stability. The fight with the co-employee was one of a series of incidents in his background that caused the employer to look with askance at his continued employment in the sensitive area at the Nevada Test Site. Correspondence exchanged between the company and the representatives of the Atomic Energy Commission operation concerning him was consistent with their proper concern over security.

Absolute immunity exists in an organization that is contracted to provide security services for the government, the same as afforded the government itself. The trial court founded its order of dismissal upon Becker v. Philco Corporation, 372 F.2d 771 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 979 (1967), and we agree.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 P.2d 609, 91 Nev. 160, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleghorn-v-goldsmith-nev-1975.