Cleckler v. State

103 So. 902, 20 Ala. App. 454, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 15
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 13, 1925
Docket5 Div. 531.
StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 902 (Cleckler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleckler v. State, 103 So. 902, 20 Ala. App. 454, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 15 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

From a conviction for the offense of violating the Prohibition Laws of the state, defendant appealed.

The points of decision, relied upon to effect a reversal of the judgment of conviction, are presented by the record, as there is no bill of exceptions.

Each question here presented has been decided by this court, present term, in the case of Lum Roseberry v. State (5 Div. 530) ante, p. 450, 103 So. 898.

Upon authority of that case, the judgment appealed from will stand affirmed. See, also, Oscar Minor v. State (5 Div. 541) ante, p. 453, 103 So. 902, present term.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roseberry v. State
103 So. 898 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 So. 902, 20 Ala. App. 454, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleckler-v-state-alactapp-1925.