Cleaveland v. McAdams

21 Ala. 321
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Ala. 321 (Cleaveland v. McAdams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleaveland v. McAdams, 21 Ala. 321 (Ala. 1852).

Opinion

GrOLDTHWAITE, J.-

— Where a party has a right of recov-ery over against another, the party thus liable may defend in any suit commenced against the person to whom he is liable; but the defence in such case is conducted in the name of the defendant on the record, and the court is not authorized to [322]*322render judgment against both, parties. In the present case, it does not appear that Oleaveland and his wife were admitted as parties to the record, but that they were admitted with leave to defend, which would not authorize them to be placed in the judgment as defendants.

As the writ of error, however, is not sued out in the name of all the defendants, it must be amended, so as to correspond with the judgment, and the judgment must be reversed, and be here rendered against the defendant Hutchinson alone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Webb's Heirs
29 Ala. 588 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ala. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleaveland-v-mcadams-ala-1852.