Cleaveland v. Hunter
This text of 1 Wend. 104 (Cleaveland v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
It is a matter of sound, discretion with the referees, to open a cause after it has been submitted to them, for the purpose of hearing further testimony ; and it is to be-presumed that they will discreetly exercise such discretion. Here an important question was left in doubt, in their minds, which they believed could be dispelled by further proof; they therefore did right in adjourning the cause, to give the party an opportunity of producing further testimony. The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wend. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleaveland-v-hunter-nysupct-1828.