Cleary v. Pieper
This text of 184 S.W. 4 (Cleary v. Pieper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Reversing.
• At a special election field November 3rd, 1914, in Kenton County, upon a proposition to issue county bonds of the par value of $150,000.00, for the purpose of -building roads and bridges, there were 5,204 votes for the proposition, and 3,527 against it;
While the proposition secured a majority of the •votes cast at the election, it did not secure two-thirds of them.
On March 6th, 1916, the appellee Fred Pieper filed this action against Cleary, the county judge, and the Fiscal Court of Kenton- County, seeking to compel the appellants, by mandamus, to issue the bonds which he claimed they were authorized to issue by virtue of the election. . The circuit, court granted the relief asked, and the defendants appeal.
We considered the question here presented at some length in the case of Gratton v. The Fiscal Court of Daviess County, this day decided and reported in 169 [435]*435Ky. 425, wherein we held, that under section 157a of the constitution, an indebtedness for public road purposes may be created by a majority of the voters of the county who participate in the election upon that question.
It follows, therefore, that the Fiscal Court of Kenton County was authorized by the election, to issue the bonds in question.
For this error, the judgment is reversed for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 S.W. 4, 169 Ky. 434, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleary-v-pieper-kyctapp-1916.