Clearkin v. Taheny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Clearkin v. Taheny

100 A. 1053, 256 Pa. 615, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 670

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 26, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 331

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 1053 (Clearkin v. Taheny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clearkin v. Taheny, 100 A. 1053, 256 Pa. 615, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 670 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

By the decree of the court below the appellant is fully protected against all claims, suits, actions and demands of the unpaid creditors of the partnership. Under the facts properly found by the learned referee he has no further interest in the assets of the same, and the proper decree was that the ownership and title to the properties involved should be vested absolutely in the appellee.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

By the decree of the court below the appellant is fully protected against all claims, suits, actions and demands of the unpaid creditors of the partnership. Under the facts properly found by the learned referee he has no further interest in the assets of the same, and the proper decree was that the ownership and title to the properties involved should be vested absolutely in the appellee.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A. 1053, 256 Pa. 615, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clearkin-v-taheny-pa-1917.