Cleare v. State
This text of 321 So. 2d 122 (Cleare v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The only substantial question presented on this appeal is whether the evidence considered as a whole is sufficient to establish that the defendant was guilty of grand larceny as distinguished from petty larceny. The appellant stole two cases of cigarettes, containing fifty-eight cartons. The two cases were testified to contain 580 individual packages of cigarettes. The State’s witness in response to the question: “Do you know the value of these fifty-eight cartons of cigarettes ? ” gave an answer as to the value of the individual packs as follows: “Well, wholesale they cost us forty-two cents. Retail we sell them for sixty.”
We hold that a fair reading of the testimony shows that the two cases of cigarettes had a value of at least $243.1 The judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Golden v. Morris, Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 714.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 So. 2d 122, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleare-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.