Clear View Enterprises v. Beauvil

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: January 11, 2023
• Docket: 2:22-cv-01119
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Clear View Enterprises, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, 1] No. No. 2:22-cv-01119-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, 12 AMENDED ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Elizabeth Raquel Beauvil aka Beauvil Raquel Beauvil et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Based on the parties’ stipulation, the court ordered the dismissal of plaintiffs eleventh, 18 | twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth claims under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)-(d), Racketeering Influenced 19 | and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Prior Order (Nov. 30, 2022), ECF No. 16. On December 20 | 21, 2022, the parties submitted a notice of errata noting that while their stipulation provided that 21 | the RICO claims were asserted in the eleventh through fourteenth causes of action, the RICO 22 | claims are actually asserted in the twelfth through fifteenth causes of action. Notice of Errata, 23 | ECF No. 22. 24 The court may correct clerical mistakes. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a); see also Tattersalls, 25 | Ltd. v. DeHaven, 745 F.3d 1294, 1297 (9th Cir. 2014) (explaining Rule 60(a) is properly invoked 26 | to correct “blunders in execution” that prevented an order or judgment from achieving “what the 27 | court originally intended to do” (citations, quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)). 28 | Accordingly, the court’s prior order at ECF No. 16 is amended as follows: Plaintiffs twelfth,

1 | thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth claims under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)-(d), RICO, are dismissed 2 | without prejudice as to defendants Lawrence B. Albano, Elizabeth Raquel Beauvil and Global 3 | Empire Holdings. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 | DATED: January 10, 2023. 6 /\ (] TVW X CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE