Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 15, 2025·No. 2:22-cv-01119·Unknown

Opinion

Clear View Enterprises, LLP, No. 2:22-cv-01119-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., 1S Defendants. Plaintiff Clear View Enterprises, LLP is pursuing claims in this action against defendants Elizabeth Beauvil, Global Empire Holdings LLC, Lawrence Albano, and Chelsea Jones. Albano and Global Empire Holdings later filed cross claims against Beauvil and Tanpri Media & Arts, Inc. The Clerk’s Office entered the default of Beauvil and Tanpri in July 2025. ECF Nos. 62-63. On September 10, 2025, the court set a thirty-day deadline for any motion for default judgment. ECF No. 64. Clear View, Albano and Global Empire Holdings now stipulate and jointly request an extension of that deadline. ECF No. 65. They explain the claims against all defendants are intertwined and ask the court to defer consideration of a motion for default judgment until any damages can be ascertained. /d. at 3. The stipulated request is granted. See Garamendi v. Henin, 683 F.3d 1069, 1082 (9" Cir. 2012) (summarizing rule that when defendants are “similarly situated,” and one of them defaults, “judgment should not be entered against the defaulting defendant until the matter has been

adjudicated with regard to all defendants”) (quoting Jn Neilson v. Chang (In re First T.D. & Investment, Inc.), 253 F.3d 520, 532 (9th Cir. 2001)). The deadline for motions for default judgment against Beauvil and Tanpri is extended to thirty days from the date the court enters dismissal or judgment, as applicable, against cross- claimants Albano and Global Empire Holdings. DATED: October 15, 2025. ot STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al. (Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Garamendi v. Jean-Francois Hennin
683 F.3d 1069 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Neilson v. Chang
253 F.3d 520 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)