Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedOctober 15, 2025
Docket2:22-cv-01119
StatusUnknown

This text of Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al. (Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Clear View Enterprises, LLP, No. 2:22-cv-01119-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Clear View Enterprises, LLP is pursuing claims in this action against defendants 18 | Elizabeth Beauvil, Global Empire Holdings LLC, Lawrence Albano, and Chelsea Jones. Albano 19 | and Global Empire Holdings later filed cross claims against Beauvil and Tanpri Media & Arts, 20 | Inc. The Clerk’s Office entered the default of Beauvil and Tanpri in July 2025. ECF Nos. 62-63. 21 | On September 10, 2025, the court set a thirty-day deadline for any motion for default judgment. 22 | ECF No. 64. Clear View, Albano and Global Empire Holdings now stipulate and jointly request 23 | an extension of that deadline. ECF No. 65. They explain the claims against all defendants are 24 | intertwined and ask the court to defer consideration of a motion for default judgment until any 25 | damages can be ascertained. /d. at 3. 26 The stipulated request is granted. See Garamendi v. Henin, 683 F.3d 1069, 1082 (9" Cir. 27 | 2012) (summarizing rule that when defendants are “similarly situated,” and one of them defaults, 28 | “judgment should not be entered against the defaulting defendant until the matter has been

1 | adjudicated with regard to all defendants”) (quoting Jn Neilson v. Chang (In re First T.D. & 2 | Investment, Inc.), 253 F.3d 520, 532 (9th Cir. 2001)). 3 The deadline for motions for default judgment against Beauvil and Tanpri is extended to 4 | thirty days from the date the court enters dismissal or judgment, as applicable, against cross- 5 | claimants Albano and Global Empire Holdings. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | DATED: October 15, 2025. ot STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Garamendi v. Jean-Francois Hennin
683 F.3d 1069 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Neilson v. Chang
253 F.3d 520 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clear View Enterprises, LLP v. Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clear-view-enterprises-llp-v-elizabeth-beauvil-et-al-caed-2025.