Clear Spring Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 354
United States Customs Court·Decided February 28, 1961·No. No. 65211; protests 972328-G/88287, etc. (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

[355]*355Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clear Spring Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 354 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 354 (Clear Spring Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)