Clayton's Lessee v. Alshouse

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Clayton's Lessee v. Alshouse

2 U.S. 150

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1792·Published

Opinion

By the Court:

—Notice of trial was given to the defendant in the cause ; and the non-suit has been regularly entered. It was not necessary to give notice to Evan Owen : For, wherever a landlord means to take defence, he ought to make himself a party on the record.—Notice of trial was given to the defendant in the cause ; and the non-suit has been regularly entered. It was not necessary to give notice to Evan Owen : For, wherever a landlord means to take defence, he ought to make himself a party on the record.

The rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

—Notice of trial was given to the defendant in the cause ; and the non-suit has been regularly entered. It was not necessary to give notice to Evan Owen : For, wherever a landlord means to take defence, he ought to make himself a party on the record.—Notice of trial was given to the defendant in the cause ; and the non-suit has been regularly entered. It was not necessary to give notice to Evan Owen : For, wherever a landlord means to take defence, he ought to make himself a party on the record.

The rule refused.

Clayton's Lessee v. Alshouse, 2 U.S. 150 (1792).

Pincite

2 U.S. 150 (Clayton's Lessee v. Alshouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.