Clayton Wayne Blaschke v. Amy Leigh Blaschke
This text of Clayton Wayne Blaschke v. Amy Leigh Blaschke (Clayton Wayne Blaschke v. Amy Leigh Blaschke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00064-CV
Clayton Wayne Blaschke
v.
Amy Leigh Blaschke
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 428TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 09-1575, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING
Clayton Wayne Blaschke filed a notice of appeal from the order terminating his parental rights. Because the notice of appeal was filed untimely, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss this appeal.
An appeal from an order terminating the parent-child relationship is an accelerated appeal. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(a), (c) (West 2008). The notice of appeal in an accelerated case is due to be filed no more than 20 days after the trial court signs the judgment. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The filing of post-judgment motions will not extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 28.1(b). The time for filing a notice of appeal in an accelerated case can be extended by 15 days upon timely motion. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 28.1(b). Thus, a notice of appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights must be filed no later than 35 days after the judgment is signed.
The judgment terminating appellant's parental rights was signed October 28, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed February 3, 2010. The notice of appeal in this case was filed 98 days after the judgment terminating parental rights was signed, which is beyond the maximum period allowed. Under these facts, appellant did not timely invoke this Court's jurisdiction.
Appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal, but did not present grounds on which this Court could grant the relief requested. This Court's clerk sent a letter describing these apparent circumstances, and requested a response explaining how this Court might properly exercise jurisdiction. No response has been filed.
Appellant's Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal is denied. This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
G. Alan Waldrop, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 31, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clayton Wayne Blaschke v. Amy Leigh Blaschke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-wayne-blaschke-v-amy-leigh-blaschke-texapp-2010.