Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Sec. of State

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2021·No. 20-3199·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 20-3199

Clayton Walker

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Steve Barnett, Secretary of State; Marcia Hultman, Department of Labor

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

United States of America; Unknown Federal Persons

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern

Submitted: April 7, 2021 Filed: April 12, 2021

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

South Dakota resident Clayton Walker appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint for failure to properly serve the defendants. See Mac v. Dillon, 594 F.3d 620, 622 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also deny the motion for PACER access as moot. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Sec. of State, (8th Cir. 2021).

Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Sec. of State (Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Sec. of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacK v. Dillon
594 F.3d 620 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)