Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett
This text of Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett (Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-2870 ___________________________
Clayton Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Steve Barnett, Secretary of State, in his official capacity; Shantel Krebs, in her individual capacity; Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity; Jason Ravnsborg, in his official capacity; Kea Warne, in her official capacity
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern ____________
Submitted: March 22, 2021 Filed: April 2, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Clayton Walker appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil action challenging the constitutionality of certain South Dakota election laws. Upon careful de novo review, see Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Libertarian Party of N.D. v. Jaeger, 659 F.3d 687, 692-93 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walker’s appellate motions. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-walker-v-steve-barnett-ca8-2021.