Clayton v. Wilkins

197 P.2d 162, 32 Cal. 2d 895, 1948 Cal. LEXIS 282
California Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1948·No. L. A. No. 20399·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendants appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction enjoining occupancy of certain lots of land by non-Caucasians.

Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. -] (see also Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. -]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the order of the trial court granting the preliminary injunction must be reversed. (See also Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844 [193 P.2d 742]; Cassell v. Hickerson (1948), 31 Cal.2d 869 [193 P.2d 743]; Davis v. Carter (1948), 31 Cal.2d 870 [193 P.2d 744]; In re Laws (1948), 31 Cal.2d 846 [193 P.2d 744]; Lippold v. Johnson, ante, p. 892 [197 P.2d 161]; and Morin v. Crane, post, p. 896 [197 P.2d 162].)

For the reasons above stated the order appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. Wilkins, 197 P.2d 162, 32 Cal. 2d 895, 1948 Cal. LEXIS 282 (Cal. 1948).

197 P.2d 162 (Clayton v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barrows v. Jackson
247 P.2d 99 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Coleman v. Stewart
204 P.2d 7 (California Supreme Court, 1949)
Morin v. Crane
197 P.2d 162 (California Supreme Court, 1948)
Cavett v. Butler
32 Cal. 2d 894 (California Supreme Court, 1948)