Clayton v. Tonkin
9 N.J.L. 253
This text of 9 N.J.L. 253 (Clayton v. Tonkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clayton v. Tonkin, 9 N.J.L. 253 (N.J. 1827).
Opinion
It is the duty of the justice to enter on his docket the names of the plaintiff and defendant. Here the justice has neglected to do so. The initials S. T. may stand for a variety of names as well as that of Samuel Tonkin. It is impossible .to tell from the record what was the name of the deceased person these executors intended to represent.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 N.J.L. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-tonkin-nj-1827.